Skip to content


More on the Revision of Brown-Driver-Briggs

I received news from Professor Huehnergard that he and Professor Hackett are indeed working on the revision of BDB. Unfortunately, the project was put on hold shortly after it began four years, but they plan to return to it after they move to UTA and settle in at Austin. He estimated that the project should take five to seven years to complete, and so my guess is that we will not see a finished product until 2015 at the earliest.

In the comments of my previous post on BDB, James Aitken informed us that the 2005 SBL paper given by Huehnergard and Hackett was just published this week in Foundations for Syriac Lexicography III edited by Janet Dyk and Wido van Peursen. Since Professor Huehnergard was also kind enough to send along a PDF of this chapter, I thought I would highlight some of its contents.

Etymology is one of BDB’s strongest areas, yet it is obviously quite dated at the same time. They plan to retain this strong emphasis on etymology in the revision. “A BDB with thoroughly revised and updated etymological information will fulfil a long-felt need and will stand out among all other current lexica” (228). In order to update the cognate section of BDB, Huehnergard and Hackett plan to take advantage of the recently published lexica. I won’t rehearse it here, but the article lists the resources for the following languages/topics: Northwest Semitic Inscriptions; Akkadian; Northwest Semitic Words in Akkadian; Jewish Palestinian, Jewish Babylonian, and Judean Aramaic; Syriac; Ethiopic; Ugaritic; Old South Arabian; Modern South Arabian; Arabic; Eblaite; and Comparative Semitics (see pages 228-30).

As far as the style of the book, they will keep the famous BDB organization based on roots, so that (presumably) future generations can suffer just like we did and those who went before us. They will, however, put the roots on the page headers, rather than the individual words, which should make it easier to locate entries. Also, they will add an alphabetical index containing all the headwords, which will help the user locate their word in BDB much quicker. I guess the future generation won’t suffer as much!

There will also be a number of presentational improvements. Verbal roots will be listed as roots (not Qal 3ms verbs), which will do away with all those bracketed (not attested) forms. English instead of Latin abbreviations will be used, and they will transliterate other scripts (e.g., Arabic). They will also include a bibliography or update existing bibliographies for controversial topics.

Lastly, they remind readers that BDB is a revision of previous lexica and its need for revision is long overdue. The process will consult other lexica and relevant articles. The final product will be roughly the same size as the current BDB.

People interested in lexicography will will want to read the article for themselves, since I just highlighted a portion of its contents.

  • Hackett, Jo Ann and John Huehnergard. “On Revising and Updating BDB.” Pages 227-33 in Foundations for Syriac Lexicography III: Colloquia of the International Syriac Language Project. Ed. by Janet Dyk and W. Th. van Peursen. PSL 4. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2009.

Posted in Books, Hebrew Bible.

Tagged with , , .


9 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. John Anderson says

    So you just shot an email to Huehnergard, and he responded that quick? Impressive! It’s always nice when significant scholars take the time to respond, and so quickly. Walter Brueggemann has always been quick to reply to my emails as well. Pretty cool stuff.

  2. Brandon Wason says

    Actually, I shot an email to Hackett and she forwarded it him and he responded.

  3. John Anderson says

    Still, impressive. That’s a good husband/wife team!

  4. jim says

    well there’s no point looking forward to it then. books of this nature are always delayed. always. we won’t most likely live to see it.

  5. J. P. says

    I don’t share Jim’s pessimism. I can’t think of anyone more qualified to do this revision than John, and his discipline and focus will serve him well.

  6. jim says

    i can’t think of anyone better to do it either. my pessimism (as you call it- i prefer the term ‘realism’) is based on long experience with the way these sorts of things move forward.

  7. Ben says

    I wish they wouldn’t transliterate the other scripts. I found it a good way to either learn or keep fresh one, say, my one semester of Ge’ez.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Awilum.com » Should Hackett-Huehnergard be the Ones to Revise BDB? linked to this post on July 9, 2009

    [...] Brandon Wason has provided very helpful clarification on the project to revise BDB.  It seems that the main focus of the effort will be to update the etymological sections of the entries along with providing limited bibliography.  These are very worthy goals and surely BDB is in sore need of this kind of update (for all the reasons Jim Getz outlines).  I think John Huehnergard is one of the best Semitists in the world and I will buy his rework of BDB for that reason. [...]

  2. clayboy » This week’s link love: eclectic selections for your delectation linked to this post on July 11, 2009

    [...] Getz and Brandon Wason (twice) are among those noting and commenting on the proposed revision of the Brown-Driver-Briggs lexicon. [...]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.