Comments on: SBL and Bibliobloggers

By: Affiliate This! « kata ta biblia

Affiliate This! « kata ta biblia — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:24:06 +0000

[...] Now for the one genuine negative that I see. Bob Cargill said in his post, “affiliation lends legitimacy to the vehicle of blogging.” This can be a problem when it comes to the average student surfing the web looking for legitimate material. Sure, the affiliation and the resulting badge do not mean that the SBL agrees with or officially endorses all content on any blog that is in this affiliation. But say some student is smart enough to use the custom search of biblioblogs to look for material on a given topic. They find some crazy theory by someone way out on the fringes of accepted scholarship (like Brandon, for example ) and assume that it’s acceptable fact because of this affiliation (good thing Brandon won’t put the badge on his blog!). [...]

By: SBL Affiliation Posts Consolidated « Daniel O. McClellan

SBL Affiliation Posts Consolidated « Daniel O. McClellan — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:24:58 +0000

[...] Brandon Wason [...]

By: On the SBL and “Bibliobloggers” « confessions of a bible junkie

On the SBL and “Bibliobloggers” « confessions of a bible junkie — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:03:40 +0000

[...] evolving relationship, but hope for some exciting new developments—are pretty similar to those of Brandon Wason: I’m still not entirely sure what the implications are of such an affiliation, but I do think it [...]

By: Bryan

Bryan — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:25:50 +0000

I’m glad you said that about the logo, I thought I was the only one!