<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sitz im Leben &#187; ben witherington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sitzimleben.com/tag/ben-witherington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sitzimleben.com</link>
	<description>The Jesus Tradition&#8212;Then and Now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>McKnight on Witherington&#8217;s Commentaries</title>
		<link>http://sitzimleben.com/2009/07/01/mcknight-on-witherintons-commentaries/</link>
		<comments>http://sitzimleben.com/2009/07/01/mcknight-on-witherintons-commentaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandonw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben witherington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scot mcknight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sitzimleben.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On his blog, Scot McKnight recently surveyed some of the commentaries he consults on Philippians. (For a more thorough list see Kevin Scull&#8217;s recent post on the subject.)
What I wanted to draw attention to was McKnight&#8217;s remark about Ben Witherington&#8217;s commentaries:
Some of Ben&#8217;s readers have asked me why I don&#8217;t mention Ben Witherington III more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On his blog, Scot McKnight recently <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/jesuscreed/2009/07/pastors-bookshelf-philippians.html">surveyed</a> some of the commentaries he consults on Philippians. (For a more thorough list see Kevin Scull&#8217;s <a href="http://kevinscull.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/philippians-commentary-rankings/">recent post</a> on the subject.)</p>
<p>What I wanted to draw attention to was McKnight&#8217;s remark about Ben Witherington&#8217;s commentaries:</p>
<blockquote><p>Some of Ben&#8217;s readers have asked me why I don&#8217;t mention Ben Witherington III more often. Well, when someone has written a commentary on every NT book, it is unlikely they can be mentioned with those who have spent a decade or more on a book, but Ben&#8217;s stuff is very good and highly useful for pastors.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>McKnight is spot on, especially in an age where there is no end to the proliferation of biblical commentaries. Witherington has a lot of devotees and his books will sell whether or not they are up to par with other commentaries. I give him credit for helping to publicize rhetorical criticism, but for the most part his commentaries are not going to be on the short list of any scholar.</p>
<p>That said, I do not think that Witherington should stop writing commentaries. Some scholars are scholars for the people and others are scholars for academia. We need a wide range of scholars to write for different audiences. If it hadn&#8217;t been for F. F. Bruce, I wouldn&#8217;t have gained an interest in biblical scholarship otherwise. So keep those commentaries coming Benny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sitzimleben.com/2009/07/01/mcknight-on-witherintons-commentaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
